From: Greg Johnson <discgolfgreg@...>
Subject: Re: [wdgc] Hole 1 at Willamette
To: wdgc@...
Date: Tuesday, November 20, 2012, 10:07 PM

 

Is the long placement the long ago abandoned anchor of the original hole 2?   I doubt we would use it much because it messes up the flow to hole 2.  If we are allowed to use it we might as well include it on the sign.   GJ --- On Tue, 11/20/12, kineticbagel wrote: From: kineticbagel Subject: [wdgc] Hole 1 at Willamette To: wdgc@... Date: Tuesday, November 20, 2012, 12:12 PM   As we move forward with the tee signs, do we want to add the long placement on hole 1? It's 634' where it sits now. What say you? G