1. Topics
  2. Hole 1 at Willamette

Hole 1 at Willamette

kineticbagel <kineticbagel@...>
 

As we move forward with the tee signs, do we want to add the long placement on hole 1?
It's 634' where it sits now.
What say you?
G
Greg Johnson
 

Is the long placement the long ago abandoned anchor of the original hole 2?
 
I doubt we would use it much because it messes up the flow to hole 2.  If we are allowed to use it we might as well include it on the sign.
 
GJ


--- On Tue, 11/20/12, kineticbagel wrote:

From: kineticbagel
Subject: [wdgc] Hole 1 at Willamette
To: wdgc@...
Date: Tuesday, November 20, 2012, 12:12 PM

 
As we move forward with the tee signs, do we want to add the long placement on hole 1?
It's 634' where it sits now.
What say you?
G
Mike Gibson
 

Bout time you got your butt out to Willamette.


--- On Tue, 11/20/12, Greg Johnson wrote:

From: Greg Johnson <discgolfgreg@...>
Subject: Re: [wdgc] Hole 1 at Willamette
To: wdgc@...
Date: Tuesday, November 20, 2012, 10:07 PM

 

Is the long placement the long ago abandoned anchor of the original hole 2?
 
I doubt we would use it much because it messes up the flow to hole 2.  If we are allowed to use it we might as well include it on the sign.
 
GJ

--- On Tue, 11/20/12, kineticbagel wrote:

From: kineticbagel
Subject: [wdgc] Hole 1 at Willamette
To: wdgc@...
Date: Tuesday, November 20, 2012, 12:12 PM

 
As we move forward with the tee signs, do we want to add the long placement on hole 1?
It's 634' where it sits now.
What say you?
G
Eric Smith
 

It isn’t that far.

 

Greg, is there a flag in the ground?

 

From: wdgc@... [mailto:wdgc@...] On Behalf Of Greg Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 10:08 PM
To: wdgc@...
Subject: Re: [wdgc] Hole 1 at Willamette

 

 

Is the long placement the long ago abandoned anchor of the original hole 2?

 

I doubt we would use it much because it messes up the flow to hole 2.  If we are allowed to use it we might as well include it on the sign.

 

GJ

--- On Tue, 11/20/12, kineticbagel <kineticbagel@...> wrote:


From: kineticbagel <kineticbagel@...>
Subject: [wdgc] Hole 1 at Willamette
To: wdgc@...
Date: Tuesday, November 20, 2012, 12:12 PM

 

As we move forward with the tee signs, do we want to add the long placement on hole 1?
It's 634' where it sits now.
What say you?
G
kineticbagel <kineticbagel@...>
 

There has been a rebar marker, not as deep as the other placement, with a "flag" on it.
The conversations I've had lead me to to believe that most folks would prefer not to have the deep location. If it was only going to be used for tourny's, then a portable could be used instead...
Let's vote on it at the next meeting.
G
1 - 5 of 5